The Holy Council of Trent, having in view the ineffable riches of grace which are offered to the faithful who receive the Most Holy Eucharist,
makes the following declaration: "The Holy Council wishes indeed that at each Mass the faithful who are present
should communicate, not only in spiritual desire, but sacramentally, by the actual reception of the Eucharist."  These
words declare plainly enough the wish of the Church that all Christians should be daily nourished by this heavenly banquet
and should derive therefore more abundant fruit for their sanctification.
This wish of the Council fully conforms to that desire wherewith Christ our Lord was inflamed when He instituted this Divine Sacrament. For He
Himself, more than once, and in clarity of word, pointed out the necessity of frequently eating His Flesh and drinking His Blood,
especially in these words: This is the bread that has come down from heaven; not as your fathers ate the manna, and died. He who eats
this bread shall live forever.  From this comparison of the Food of angels with bread and with manna, it was easily to be understood by His disciples that,
as the body is daily nourished with bread, and as the Hebrews were daily fed with manna in the desert, so the Christian
soul might daily partake of this heavenly bread and be refreshed thereby. Moreover, we are bidden in the Lord's Prayer to ask
for "our daily bread" by which words, the holy Fathers of the Church all but unanimously teach, must be understood
not so much that material bread which is the support of the body as the Eucharistic bread which ought to be our daily food.
Moreover, the desire of Jesus Christ and of the Church that all the faithful should daily approach the sacred banquet is directed
chiefly to this end, that the faithful, being united to God by means of the Sacrament, may thence derive strength to resist their
sensual passions, to cleanse themselves from the stains of daily faults, and to avoid these graver sins to which human frailty is liable;
so that its primary purpose is not that the honor and reverence due to our Lord may be safe-guarded, or that it may serve as a reward
or recompense of virtue bestowed on the recipients.  Hence the Holy Council calls the Eucharist "the antidote whereby we may
be freed from daily faults and be preserved from mortal sin." 
The will of God in this respect was well understood by the first Christians; and they daily hastened to this Table of life and strength.
They continued steadfastly in the teaching of the apostles and in the communion of the breaking of the bread.  The holy Fathers
and writers of the Church testify that this practice was continued into later ages and not without great increase of holiness and perfection.
Piety, however, grew cold, and especially afterward because of the widespread plague of Jansenism, disputes began to arise
concerning the dispositions with which one ought to receive frequent and daily Communion; and writers vied with one another demanding more and
more stringent conditions as necessary to be fulfilled. The result of such disputes was that very few were considered worthy to receive the
Holy Eucharist daily, and to derive from this most health-giving Sacrament its more abundant fruits; the others were content to partake of it once
a year, or once a month, or at most once a week. To such a degree, indeed, was rigorism carried that whole classes of persons were excluded from a
frequent approach to the Holy Table, for instance, merchants or those who were married.
Some, however, went over to the opposite view. They held that daily Communion was prescribed by divine law and that no day should pass without
communicating, and besides other practices not in accord with the approved usage of the Church, they determined that the Eucharist must be received even
on Good Friday and in fact so administered it.
Toward these conditions, the Holy See did not fail in its duty. A decree of this Sacred Congregation which begins with the words Cum ad aures,
issued on February 12, 1679, with the approbation of Pope Innocent XI, condemned these errors, and put a stop to such abuses; at the same
time it declared that all the faithful of whatsoever class, merchants or married persons not at all excepted, could be admitted to frequent Communion
according to the devotion of each one and the judgement of his confessor. Then on December 7, 1690, by the Decree of Pope Alexander VIII,
Sanctissimus Dominus noster, the proposition of Baius was condemned, requiring a most pure love of God, without any admixture of defect, on the part
of those who wished to approach the Holy Table.
The poison of Jansenism, however, which, under the pretext of showing due honor and reverence to the Eucharist, had infected the minds even of
good men, was by no means a thing of the past. The question as to the dispositions for the proper and licit reception of Holy Communion
survived the declarations of the Holy See, and it was a fact that certain theologians of good repute were of the opinion that daily Communion
could be permitted to the faithful only rarely and subject to many conditions.
On the other hand, there were not wanting men endowed with learning and piety who offered an easier approach to this practice, so
salutary and so pleasing to God. They taught, with the authority of the Fathers, that there is no precept of the Church which prescribes
more perfect dispositions in the case of daily than of weekly or monthly Communion; while the fruits of daily Communion will be far more abundant
than those of Communion received weekly or monthly.
In our own day the controversy has continued with increased warmth, and not without bitterness, so that the minds of confessors and the
consciences of the faithful have been disturbed, to the no small detriment of Christian piety and fervor. Certain distinguished men, themselves pastors
of souls, have as a result of this, urgently egged His Holiness, Pope Pius X, to deign to settle, by his supreme authority, the question concerning
the dispositions required to receive the Eucharist daily; so that this practice, so salutary and so pleasing to God, not only might suffer no
decrease among the faithful, but rather that it increase and everywhere be promoted, especially in these days when religion and the Catholic faith
are attacked on all sides, and the true love of God and piety are so frequently lacking. His Holiness, being most earnestly desirous, out of his
solicitude and zeal, that the faithful should be invited to the sacred banquet as often as possible, even daily, and should benefit by its most abundant
fruits, committed the aforesaid question to this Sacred Congregation, to be studies and decided definitely (definiendam).
Accordingly, the Sacred Congregation of the Council, in a plenary Session held on December 16, 1905, submitted this matter to a very
careful study, and after sedulously examining the reasons adduced on either side, determined and declared as follows:
1. Frequent and daily Communion, as a practice most earnestly desired by Christ our Lord and by the Catholic Church, should be open to all the faithful,
of whatever rank and condition of life; so that no one who is in the state of grace, and approaches the Holy Table with a right and devout
intention (recta piaque mente) can be prohibited therefrom.
2. A right intention consists in this: that he who approaches the Holy Table should do so, not out of routine, or vain-glory, or human respect,
but that he wish to please God, to be more closely united with Him by charity, and to have recourse to this divine remedy for his weakness and defects.
3. Although it is especially fitting that those who receive Communion frequently or daily should be free from venial sins, at least from such as are
fully deliberate, and from any affection thereto, nevertheless, it is sufficient that they be free from mortal sin, with the purpose of never sinning
in the future; and if they have this sincere purpose, it is impossible by that daily communicants should gradually free themselves even from venial sins,
and from all affection thereto.
4. Since, however, the Sacraments of the New Law, though they produce their effect ex opere operato, nevertheless, produce a great effect in
proportion as the dispositions of the recipient are better, therefore, one should take care that Holy Communion be preceded by careful preparation, and
followed by an appropriate thanksgiving, according to each one's strength, circumstances and duties.
5. That the practice of frequent and daily Communion may be carried out with greater prudence and more fruitful merit, the confessor's advice should
be asked. Confessors, however, must take care not to dissuade anyone from frequent or daily Communion, provided he is found to be in a state of grace and
approaches with a right intention.
6. But since it is plain that by the frequent or daily reception of the Holy Eucharist union with Christ is strengthened, the spiritual life more
abundantly sustained, the soul more richly endowed with virtues, and the pledge of everlasting happiness more securely bestowed on recipients, therefore,
parish priests, confessors and preachers, according to the approved teaching of the Roman Catechism  should exhort the faithful frequently and with
great zeal to this devout and salutary practice.
7. Frequent and daily Communion is to be promoted especially in religious Institutes of all kinds; with regard to which, however, the Decree Quemadmodum
issued on December 17, 1890, by the Sacred Congregation of Bishops and Regulars, is to remain in force. It is to be promoted especially in ecclesiastical
seminaries, where students are preparing for the service of the altar; as also in all Christian establishments which in any way provide for the care
of the young (ephebeis).
8. In the case of religious Institutes, whether of solemn or simple vows, in whose rules, or constitutions, or calendars, Communion is assigned to
certain fixed days, such regulations are to be considered as directive and not prescriptive. The prescribed number of Communions should be regarded as a minimum
but not a limit to the devotion of the religious. Therefore, access to the Eucharistic Table, whether it be rather frequently or daily, must always be freely open
to them according to the norms above laid down in this Decree. Furthermore, in order that all religious of both sexes may clearly understand the prescriptions
of this Decree, the Superior of each house will provide that it be read in community, in the vernacular, every year within the octave of the Feast of Corpus Christi.
9. Finally, after the publication of this Decree, all ecclesiastical writers are to cease from contentious controversy concerning the dispositions requisite for
frequent and daily Communion.
All this having been reported to His Holiness, Pope Pius X, by the undersigned Secretary of the Sacred Congregation in an audience held on December 17, 1905, His
Holiness ratified this Decree, confirmed it and ordered its publication, anything to the contrary notwithstanding. He further ordered that it should be sent
to all local Ordinaries and regular prelates, to be communicated by them to their respective seminaries, parishes, religious institutes, and priests;
and that in their report on the state of their dioceses or institutes they should inform the Holy See concerning the execution of the prescriptions therein enacted.
Given at Rome, the 20th Day of December, 1905.
Vincent, Card. Bishop of Palestrina, Prefect
Cajetan DeLai, Secretary